Meg Lee Chin

These are perhaps four of the most dangerous words of our modern times.


It's a fault which resides within the trajectory of the European Union which was largely plotted under the watchful eye of US intelligence to isolate the decision-making executive powers fully from the prying eyes of democracy.

The American Committee on United Europe (ACUE), founded in 1948, was a private American organization that sought to counter communism in Europe by promoting European political integration. The committee was used as a discreet way to funnel CIA funds to organizations supporting European federalism. A United Europe would be easier to control than many sovereign nation-states.

A memo dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth. It recommends suppressing debate until the point at which "adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable". (from Wikipedia)

When the British people voted to join in 1975 it was misleadingly sold as merely a customs union. Little did they know, that the blueprint for a federated European Superstate had already been planned to erode the sovereignty of every nation-state on the European continent.

Today we see that the aims of these US CIA chiefs are coming to fruition. First came the flag, the anthem and then the Euro. Last year the EU announced its intention to form a European army, navy and air force. In March 2019, the EU passed Article 13 which marked the beginning of a digital Fortress Europe and the end of the internet as an open global network.

The ugly truth for well-intentioned Remainers, is that behind closed doors, the EU is a runaway juggernaut fuelled by multi-national corporate power.

In 2016 the British people voted to leave in order to end the erosion of their sovereignty. Article 50 was triggered to take them out of the European Union.

But 40 years of propaganda had taken its toll. Through the deployment of high profile PR projects, the EU managed to craft an image of benevolent, progressive liberalism. Highly visible were the huge blue stickers plastered throughout the meeting places of their chosen demographic. These were the halls of academia, arts foundations, science, and other such progressive organizations. In short, the EU took UK taxpayer money and lavished it upon the "influencers".

The effectiveness upon those too young to remember the EU's origins is clear. Much of the so-called "educated" classes, the urban elite and Britain's youth actually believe a vote to remain is an ethical stance. They imagine it represents progressive values such as multiculturalism, tolerance, and peace. It's the Coca Cola commercialization of politics, where one can simply buy a soft drink to signal that they are a good person. They'd like to teach the world to sing.

But this conflation is truly weird, for Brexit, is fundamentally, a decision over a system of governance with only vague, rather thin connections to world peace, harmony, and singing.

So how did this weird association arise and at such a deep psychological level? Even worse how did a vote to leave became like a bestial mark upon the forehead? I've actually heard some Remainers claim that all Brexiteers are guilty of racism.

But we know that most US prisoners tend to be Democrats. By that same logic, any democratic win would be swayed by rapists and murderers. It's warped thinking flawed in its simplification.

The implications for the future of mass manipulation worldwide are sinister. According to reports, China have learned a trick or two and have infiltrated academia, and other such institutions in Hong Kong and Taiwan.

But the real question for today is not whether you are a good or bad person based on your ability to tick a box.

The question is;

Do you prefer the efficiency of an undemocratic super-state which is prone to the corruptibility of a few hands at the top?

Or do you the messiness of a local democracy which offers protection against those four words which mark our era;


Just say NO to technocratic superstates.